Tuesday, January 7, 2025

Wildcard Round Predictions



Wildcard weekend is almost here!!  So who do I have winning the six games we will feast on?

CHARGERS AT TEXANS: Texans have really slogged through the regular season, losing 5 of their last 9 games. Aside from an impressive win over the Bills in Week 4, they haven't beaten a playoff team this year.  I really can't shake that 31-2 loss to the Ravens on Christmas. The Chargers have also only beaten one playoff team this season -- the Broncos twice. But this seems like the more consistent team in a better head space right now. I have the Chargers winning this one. 

STEELERS AT RAVENS: Anyone who has paid attention to Pittsburgh has seen their offense at their worst, scoring just 57 points (14.3 ppg) in their four game losing streak. Three weeks ago the Ravens spanked the Steelers in Baltimore and I see this game going the same way. Ravens win. 

BRONCOS AT BILLS: This has become the trendy upset pick and I can see why. Denver's defense is the perfect kind of defense to go up against this Josh Allen offense. They get to the quarterback and they have a shut down corner that forces the quarterback to work his other receivers. I get it. I still think Buffalo wins this game and sets up a showdown with the Ravens. 

PACKERS AT EAGLES: A rematch from the Week 1 Brazil game that the Packers almost won. Love is banged up and I feel that Philly is the most complete team in the NFL. The Eagles make mistakes that could be their demise in these playoffs, but I feel they are destined to face the Lions in the NFC championship game. Eagles fly to a comfortable win. 

COMMANDERS AT BUCCANEERS: Note that I am a Commanders fan, so it's hard for me to pick against Washington. But I will. This has been a fantastic season for the Commanders and the future is extremely bright. But Tampa is better right now. They can run the ball (Washington struggles at that) and I feel Mike Evans is going to have a major game. However, I'd love to see these two quarterbacks who have been so clutch all season long have chances to will their teams to win. I just think the Buccaneers eek this one out. 

VIKINGS AT RAMS: This should be great. Two explosive offenses and two of the young great offensive minds at head coach. I'm so torn on this. I trust the Rams more ... especially now that they are healthy. But Minnesota has been so good this entire season. The key is if the Rams defense can force Sam Darnold to look chaotic like the Lions did last Sunday. Minnesota's defense is much better at home than on the road so I'm going with the Rams. 

Wednesday, January 1, 2025

Sportz' 2025 Predictions



I know I won't be right on all of these, but I'll talk smack about the few I'm right about. Here we go:

*Celtics repeat. Unfortunately. I just think this roster is too good in comparison to the rest of the field that they will end up hanging their 19th banner. I really like to see them face the Oklahoma City Thunder in the Finals, but I think Boston's experience in that moment pulls them through. 

*Kansas City Chiefs won't three-peat. It hasn't been done in the Super Bowl era and hasn't been done since the Packers in the 1960s (the only other time it happened was the Packers from 1929 to 1931). As I write this, they are 15-1 but that doesn't mean much. In the Super Bowl era, teams that has won at least 15 regular season games have only won the Super Bowl twice in seven opportunities ... and that was the 1984 Niners and 1985 Bears. I just don't think this Chiefs team is as good as Patrick Mahomes' previous three title teams and I think the Bills and Ravens are more equipped to knock them off. Of course, I could very well be wrong.

*UConn won't repeat either. The other notable team looking for a threepeat are the UConn Huskies basketball team. They've been so dominant the last two NCAA tournaments but I don't think this year's team is as polished as the previous two. The NCAA tournament is just so random as it is that all it takes is an off night to get knocked off. 

*An SEC team will win the NCAA tournament. Just a feeling, but I think one of the SEC teams wins their first tournament since Kentucky did in 2012. I can't tell which one it will be, but the Alabama-Auburn rivalry looks to be a nice start. Kentucky could do it. So could Tennessee. Maybe Florida.

*An SEC team will NOT win the College Football Playoff. This one I may not truly believe, but I'm going with it. The Big Ten has three legitimate contenders to the title and two of the Final Four could be from there. I feel the Oregon-Ohio State winner will end up winning the championship. I loved Georgia, but I'm very hesitant with Carson Beck out for the season. 

*Warriors miss the playoffs again. They'll probably get into the play-in, but this isn't a playoff team. Right now they are 10th in the standings and the teams ahead of them (Wolves, Suns, Clippers) are more likely to get better than Golden State is. The Spurs are also right there behind them, and while I don't think much of San Antonio in the grand scheme of things, they could catch fire and sneak past the Warriors. If they make a big trade and land Jimmy Butler, well that could change things. 

*Golden Knights win Stanley Cup. Just a feeling. 

*Mets miss the playoffs. Just a feeling.

*Travis Hunter won't be the NFL's No. 1 overall pick, but should be. Everyone is desperate for their franchise quarterback that they'll reach for hope instead of drafting the best player available. The Giants would most likely draft a QB with the top pick. The Patriots won't, but could feasibly trade out of a top two spot to get more picks to fill out their roster. The Jaguars are the only other team likely picking at the top that wouldn't use that pick on a QB if either Shadeur Sanders or Cam Ward were available. I'd tell all of them to draft Hunter and deal with finding a QB later. Hunter is both a culture changing person but an elite and special talent. 

*Caitlyn Clark will get the Indiana Fever to the WNBA playoffs. Self explanatory. 

*NBA announces they will be officially expanding. Signs point to Seattle and Las Vegas getting those teams. That announcement may not happen in 2025, but that's what I think eventually happens. The Minnesota Timberwolves will move to the Eastern Conference. If they keep the current six divisions, the Wolves join the Central Division, Seattle to the Pacific Division and Seattle to the Northwest Division. 

*MLB gets closer to their expansion, but doesn't. MLB has some issues this coming season. Two of their franchises will be playing in minor league ballparks. The Tampa Bay Rays will be playing in Tampa's minor league park after hurricanes made Tropicana Field unplayable, while the Oakland Athletics will leave Oakland to play in a minor league park in Sacramento (their name will just be the Athletics this year) before moving to Las Vegas by the end of the decade. While this is a problem, the A's relocation drama ... ending? ... means that the league can look at adding two or four more franchises. Unlike the NBA, there is no shoo-in candidates since several are very attractive. Nashville, Montreal, Salt Lake City, Charlotte, Portland and others are on the list. 

*Streaming becomes a more important part of sports broadcasting. While fans may complain about it, they are going to have to get used to it. The NFL has already done a lot with streaming with Amazon, Peacock, ESPN+ and Netflix while the NBA enters its new broadcast agreement next fall where streaming is a major partner. The fall of regional sports networks will make streaming options more attractive to leagues like the NBA, NHL and MLB. While people may not be used to it, they should enjoy these options. If you really think about it, we have more access to sports than we have ever had before and that's a good thing. If you refuse to pay for six or more streaming services to watch all the games, I get it. But you're still watching more games a week than you did 10 years ago and exponentially more than you did 20 or 30 years ago. Netflix's broadcast of the Paul-Tyson fight was ridiculed, but they did a much better job on their Christmas Day telecast. Netflix wants in on sports, so expect more and more games online. 

*NFL will add an 18th game. Having said what I did about streaming, the next foray for the NFL is to reach more into streaming and more into international games. Those things will compel the NFL to try to work with the player's union to add that 18th game on the schedule. That WILL NOT happen for the 2025 season, but it will be worked on extensively this year. The NFL will want to sell an international package of games to one service -- which likely will be a streaming service. Think the Thursday Night schedule for Amazon, except it will be international games for, say, Netflix. That doesn't short the other broadcast partners and gives an influx of money to both the teams and the players. If the NFL can figure out how to throw in a second bye (it happened in the 1990s, but wasn't well received) then it gives the league even more weight on the sports schedule. The NFL now has no issue stepping on other sports' toes (right NBA on Christmas?) so the NFL could start the week before Labor Day (sorry, college football) and end the regular season the second week of January. That pushes the playoffs forward a week and puts the Super Bowl around President's Day weekend. Having that second bye means there is more opportunity to have international games since there is more built it rest weeks. We could see a situation where there is a new 9am Eastern Time window for an international game most weeks. With England and Germany already in the bag and Spain in the future, there is interest in hosting these games. Add in Brazil and back to Mexico City and there are plenty of places wanting to host NFL games. Have a 10 or 14 game package and sell that to Netflix? Look for that on the horizon. 

*New ESPN streaming hub will change the game. One of the changes going on in the streaming world is how networks are streamlining their properties into their streaming service. In the non-sports world, you are seeing companies slash their networks and just integrate them into their streaming format. ESPN is essentially doing the same but creating their streaming service all encompassing. As you likely know, ESPN+ alone doesn't give you events on the linear ESPN networks -- you still must have a subscription through cable or satellite for ESPN. The new format will have all of ESPN's content on one place, which is attractive to people who just have cable for ESPN. That's a big hit for those cord companies, and could be the trend that goes into other networks. I mean, you are already seeing hubs on all these services already. 

*NCAA tournament will expand to 76 teams. Again, that won't happen for the 2025 tournament, but it will be voted in this year. There is a want to expand the tournament some, but nothing to big. Adding eight teams means the First Four gets expanded out to eight games. Here's how it goes: There will be four games on Tuesday and four games on Wednesday. Four of those games will be two 16 seeds facing off where the winners will be the 16-seeds to face the No. 1 seeds in the "real" bracket. There is a bit of a trick to this since with the pods that we can't just split those games to two on each day. Then we have four games of 12-seeds (or 11-seeds, if that's how it lands) that are not automatic qualifiers. Have all of that in Dayton for both days -- a day session of two games and a night session of two games for each day. Or, if you want, add a second site that is kind of centrally located. Maybe Nashville? Kansas City? Or maybe another Dayton-type city like Greensboro, Birmingham, Tulsa or Arlington, Texas? 

*NBA makes some rule change on three point shot. This may be less likely, but Adam Silver clearly has an issue with how his game is perceived.  He wasn't too shy about his disdain for the way the All Star Game looks and is quickly looking for a fix. He started the NBA Cup to make the early part of the season (read: the schedule that coincides with the NFL) attractive to viewers. So with a lot of people turned off by the NBA's current style of gunning threes, look for Silver to at least float some ideas out there to make the game ... more attractive. The idea I like is ditching the corner three -- having the three point arc extend out to the free throw line extended. Who knows if Silver is willing to do something that drastic immediately, but that could be a discussion that gets tried out in the G-League for a few years before the NBA actually implements it. But expect those discussions to get serious. 

*NBA's broadcasting free agency. Remember that TNT's time as an NBA broadcast partner ends after this season. That means that there will be a free agency of sorts for TNT's talent to ESPN, Amazon and NBC. Ian Eagle has already agreed to go to Amazon. Kevin Harlan will be a huge free agent, though he already does work for CBS for the NFL and the NCAA tournament (as part of the Discovery-CBS agreement). There is a lot of talent that will be leaving TNT, and while NBC and Amazon are starting from scratch, expect ESPN to really look at adding some of it as well. While Mike Breen is a legend, their top broadcast team has been a mess since they broke off Jeff Van Gundy and Mark Jackson (expect them to show up on one of those other networks). Tim Legler has been really good and may be the guy going forward, you still have to do your due diligence. 

*Tom Brady stops/slows his broadcasting career. The amount of money owed to him is outrageous, so this is a serious take, but Tom Brady may decide to be more involved in his ownership of the Las Vegas Raiders than into his broadcasting. If that's true, he may back off his FOX broadcasting commitments. That could mean he does less games, does only games close to his home, or just stops doing it altogether. He's not been great at the job, but he has shown moments where he drops key knowledge on the audience ... especially in clutch moments. 

Tuesday, December 31, 2024

Why You Should Watch Every NFL Week 18 Game



Here we are. The final week of the NFL's regular season. What's on the line? Let's see why you should watch each game this week. 

SATURDAY

BROWNS AT RAVENS: If the Ravens win this game, they are the AFC North champions and the No. 3 seed in the playoffs. A loss keeps the Steelers hope to win the division alive, which would knock the Ravens to the No. 5 seed.

BENGALS AT STEELERS: Two pronged deal here. If the Ravens lose the earlier game, then a win for the Steelers gives them the AFC North title and the No. 3 seed. Even if the Ravens win, the Steelers have a lot to play for. A win gives them the No. 5 seed and a road game at Houston while a loss could drop them to the No. 6 seed and playing at rival Baltimore. As for the Bengals, they must win to keep their playoff hopes alive. They need to win and hope both the Broncos and Dolphins lose. A loss knocks them out. 

SUNDAY, 1pm GAMES

SAINTS AT BUCCANEERS;
PANTHERS AT FALCONS: Let's put these two games together. If the Buccaneers beat the Saints, they are the NFC South champs and the No. 4 seed (they'd be the No. 3 seed if the Rams lose). A Bucs loss and a Falcons win makes Atlanta the NFC South champs and the No. 4 seed. If both teams lose, the Buccaneers are the No. 4 seed.

COMMANDERS AT COWBOYS: A win by the Commanders gives them the No. 6 seed. A loss and a Packers win gives them the No. 7 seed. 

BEARS AT PACKERS: Another classic rivalry, a Packers win and a Commanders loss gives Green Bay the No. 6 seed. Anything else and the Packers will be the No. 7 seed. 

GIANTS AT EAGLES: The only real reason to watch this game is to see if Saquon Barkley rushes for 101 yards and breaks the single season rushing record. All signs point to the Eagles resting their starters, however. 

BILLS AT PATRIOTS: A weird game. Look for Josh Allen to start to keep his streak alive, then bow out quickly. As for New England, they currently hold down the top pick in the draft which could be a gold mine for them. If they keep it, they could use it to get one of the most unique players in the country in Travis Hunter. Or ... since they already have their QB ... trade it to someone desperate and gain a haul of picks. This is a game New England doesn't want to win. So they probably will. 

TEXANS AT TITANS: Not much of a reason to watch this game. Houston is locked into the 4th seed in the AFC and should be resting their guys. The Titans have been a mess all season and are in a scrum for one of the top picks in the draft. 

JAGUARS AT COLTS: A battle of two teams who have had disappointing seasons. It has been a disaster in Jacksonville that will likely cost head coach Doug Pederson his job. There's a lot of heat in Indianapolis, too, where the quarterback hasn't improved much and is habitually injured. 

SATURDAY, 4pm GAMES

CHIEFS AT BRONCOS;
DOLPHINS AT JETS:
By the time we get to this game, we will know the Bengals result. If the Bengals lost, it comes down to the Broncos and Jets. Broncos win ... and they are in.  Broncos lose ... then the Dolphins can win and get in. If both lose and the Bengals won ... Cincinnati is in. If all of them lose, well Denver gets in.  

CHARGERS AT RAIDERS: The Chargers will know before this game if there's anything to play for. If the Steelers beat the Bengals on Saturday, the Chargers are locked into the No. 6 seed. If the Steelers lose and the Chargers beat the Raiders, they move up to the No. 5 seed. Like I mentioned before, being the 5th seed means you play on the road against the Texans and not at the Ravens. 

SEAHAWKS AT RAMS: This nearly was for the NFC West title, but a complicated tiebreaker has already given the title to the Rams. Still, LA needs to win to keep that No. 3 seed. A loss and a Buccaneers win knocks LA down the No. 4 seed. That difference is staggering, as the No. 4 seed will host a 14-3 team (Lions or Vikings) in the first round; while being the 3rd seed means hosting the Commanders or Packers. 

49ERS AT CARDINALS: Not much reason to watch this game as both teams are done for the season and neither team has been bad enough to sneak into a great draft pick. 

SUNDAY NIGHT

VIKINGS AT LIONS: This is a rather huge game. Both teams are 14-2 with the winner becoming the NFC North champion and the top overall seed in the NFC playoffs. With that comes a first round bye. The loser would be a wildcard team and drop all the way to the No. 5 seed and would play on the road at Atlanta/Tampa/Los Angeles. 

Monday, December 23, 2024

Which Game Could Be Flexed Into the Week 18 SNF Slot?

 As you probably know, the NFL sets up their Week 18 schedule to maximize the drama of the playoff race. So there will be games played at the 1pm slot that could be for seeding or division championships, and games at the 4pm slot that will do the same. But the big game is the NBC Sunday Night Football matchup which typically is a "win and your in" type of game.

So with two weeks left in the season, what games are on the radar to be that showdown?

VIKINGS AT LIONS: Both teams are 13-2 right now and there's a good chance that their Week 18 showdown will be for the No. 1 seed in the NFC. The winner gets that bye and home field advantage for the playoffs, while the loser likely drops to the No. 5 seed and will play on the road against either the NFC South or West champion. 

SEAHAWKS AT RAMS: There will need to be some things happen in Week 17 to make this game matter. Obviously, it needs Seattle to beat the Bears in Chicago and the Rams to lose to the Arizona Cardinals. If those two things happen, I believe this would end up being the frontrunner to be the Week 18 SNF game as the winner makes the playoffs while the loser would be knocked out. 

COMMANDERS AT COWBOYS: There's an outside shot that the Commanders could be sitting at 10-6 with a loss to the Falcons in Week 17, and Washington may need to win this game to clinch a playoff spot. While this has a lot of moving parts, it is a candidate to be the SNF game. Again, Washington would have to lose to Atlanta next week, giving the Falcons the tiebreaker. Tampa Bay beat Washington way back in Week 1 which could make the Commanders game a must-win if both the Buccaneers and Falcons beat the Panthers and Saints, respectively, at home. 

CHIEFS AT BRONCOS: Similar to the Commanders game, the Broncos are holding onto the final spot in the AFC, and play a team behind them in the standings next week (Bengals). If Cincinnati beats Denver next week, it puts pressure on Denver to beat Kansas City in the finale. The issue here is that the Chiefs could have clinched the No. 1 seed and will sit most of their starters -- most notably Patrick Mahomes. Now, that's happened in this game before, but with better options on the table, I could see this in that 4pm window with the Bengals-Steelers game playing concurrently. 

Wednesday, November 6, 2024

Sportz NFL Mid-season Thoughts


We just finished Week 9 of the NFL season, meaning we are at the exact halfway point of the year. Just like any season, we've had some pleasant surprises and major disappointments. So let's go division by division for a look of where we are and what's coming down the stretch.

AFC EAST 

THE GOOD
: Bills. Buffalo has built up a four game lead already and is clearly the class of this division.

THE BAD: Jets. While both the Dolphins and Jets have underperformed, Miami was more about Tua Tagovailoa's missed games than whatever the deal is with the Jets. 

THE FUTURE: The Bills run away with this thing and have it locked up by early December. Then the focus is on health and getting that No. 1 seed and making everyone come to Buffalo in January. Barring the Jets or Dolphins figuring it out, I doubt there will be another AFC East representative in the postseason. 

AFC SOUTH

THE GOOD: Texans.
Look, they haven't made the jump to elite status in the AFC, but they do hold a nice lead in the division. 

THE BAD: Jaguars. I didn't expect it to get this bad in Jacksonville. Sure, they've been in some close games that ended in losses, but close doesn't matter. 

THE FUTURE: When Nico Collins gets healthy, maybe the Texans get their offensive mojo back and make a run. I just don't see them being a danger this season -- we may be a year away. Aside from that, who knows? The Titans and Jags are bad and maybe the Colts can sneak into the playoffs if they can figure out their QB situation. 

AFC NORTH

THE GOOD: Steelers.
I have Mike Tomlin as the Coach of the Year. To be 6-2 with Justin Fields and Russell Wilson as your quarterbacks is rather amazing. That defense is ridiculous and Tomlin is hitting all the right buttons. 

THE BAD: Browns. Most felt they were a QB away from being Super Bowl contenders. That's why they made the trade for Deshaun Watson. But not only hasn't that happened, but he's been awful. Their QB situation is bad and it has manifested itself to a 2-7 record this season. 

THE FUTURE: The North could do some major damage. The Ravens just may be the biggest threat to the Chiefs getting to the Super Bowl and the Steelers could scare anyone. I'm big on the Bengals making the playoffs, but they are not a championship level team. Still, they could scare the hell out of the Chiefs if they happen to match up that wildcard round. 

AFC WEST

THE GOOD: Chiefs.
To be 8-0 after consecutive Super Bowl titles is unreal. This team is not dominant, but it knows how to win these close games. 

THE BAD: Raiders. Las Vegas has issues in the important places. The quarterback situation is one of the worst in the NFL and Antonio Pierce is getting a lot of heat. 

THE FUTURE: The Chiefs will make the playoffs, but watch out for both the Chargers and Broncos. Jim Harbaugh is doing wonders with the Bolts in what is supposed to be a transition year while Denver's defense has held up nicely as Bo Nix develops. 

SPORTZ AFC PREDICTIONS: Bills, Texans, Ravens and Chiefs win their divisions. I have the Steelers, Bengals and Chargers as the three wildcard teams. 

NFC EAST 

THE GOOD: Commanders.
Who knew this team would be 7-2 at this point? Jayden Daniels has been everything you could dream of a rookie QB and the entire franchise seems to have exorcised the Dan Snyder curse. 

THE BAD: Cowboys. This hasn't been an outright disaster, but this is a flawed roster that has been hit by injuries and a lack of both running the football and stopping the run. With Dak Prescott out for at least a month, this thing may be over in Dallas. 

THE FUTURE: The two Eagles-Commanders games should be great. I have Philadelphia winning the East, since I feel they are just more talented and more experienced in being an elite team. But Washington is coming! Dallas is done and the Giants ... though not as bad as you think ... are ready for 2025. 

NFC SOUTH

THE GOOD:
Falcons. I've been so bad at picking Falcons games this season that it is comical. They are at the halfway point to best team in the division and are set up better for success over the next couple of months. 

THE BAD: Saints. Remember after Week 2's destruction of the Cowboys that we thought the Saints were going to be trouble in the NFC? Well, since then they've lost seven straight, fired their head coach, and their QB is dodging strays from former teammates in social media. 

THE FUTURE: This division has been so difficult to read. Again, the Saints scored 91 points over their first two games and 116 points in the seven games since. This looks like the Falcons division since they have the lead, are the only team sort of surging, and have destroyed the Buccaneers twice already. The Buccaneers have dealt with so many injuries that it may be hard to crawl back into the playoff race. The Panthers are just waiting for next season. 

NFC NORTH

THE GOOD: Lions.
Detroit looks like the best team in the NFL. Certainly the NFC. 

THE BAD: Bears. Matt Eberflus is feeling some heat and Chicago has arguably the most difficult remaining schedule. Losing on that Hail Mary to Washington really stings. 

THE FUTURE: This is the power division, and I can see the Lions, Vikings and Packers all getting in. Minnesota is sort of sitting tenuously but have an easy schedule looming.

NFC WEST

THE GOOD: Rams.
I want to say the Cardinals, but for Los Angeles to be sitting at 4-4 despite missing Cooper Cup and Puca Nacua for an extended time is masterful. 

THE BAD: 49ers. This hasn't gone as planned in San Francisco as injuries just keep coming 

THE FUTURE: This might be the best division race since we have zero idea who will win it. Only one game separates first from last. 

SPORTZ NFC PREDICTIONS: I have the Eagles, Lions, Falcons and 49ers still winning the division. Wildcards are Commanders, Packers and Rams. Yeah, I think LA takes down Minnesota. 

Monday, September 16, 2024

Carolina Panthers Are Now Officially A Clown Franchise


I grew up in Charlotte, and despite me moving away many years ago I still consider it as my hometown. I am not a Carolina Panthers fan, as the team arrived in Charlotte when I was 20 years old. I grew up and still am a Washington Commanders (formerly Redskins) fan, which was the popular team in Charlotte until the NFL expanded into the Carolinas.

So I know a thing or two about clown franchises.

With Daniel Snyder gone in Washington, David Tepper's Panthers have emerged as the newest clown prince of dysfunctional franchises in the NFL. That was confirmed today when it was announced that quarterback Bryce Young will be benched for Andy Dalton in Week 3. 

Why is that the moment that made he write this? Well ...

*The Panthers seem to be throwing in the towel on Young, their No. 1 overall pick in the 2023 Draft. I'm not big on throwing players away so quickly, but I also agree that it does no good to keep living with a mistake.

*However, this team has invested heavily in acquiring Young. In 2023, the Panthers traded their 2023 first round pick (9th overall), their 2024 first round pick, a 2025 second round pick, and their top receiver, D.J. Moore. That 2024 first rounder turned into the No. 1 overall pick in the draft, which Chicago was able to use to draft USC quarterback Caleb Williams. The Bears were able to obtain Williams, Moore and offensive tackle Darnell Wright, and still has the 2025 pick to use. 

*What makes Young's selection worse is that quarterback CJ Stroud was selected right after him. Stroud was the 2023 Offensive Rookie of the Year and led the Houston Texans to the playoffs. 

*Also against Young is the fact that the Panthers had Sam Darnold in 2021 and 2022 and couldn't win with him. They also took a flyer on Baker Mayfield in 2022, and that didn't work out. Darnold is 2-0 with the Minnesota Vikings while Mayfield led NFC South rival Tampa Bay Buccaneers to the division title last year and has them 2-0 this season. 

*Young is 2-16 as a starter in Carolina, with 11 touchdowns and 13 interceptions. 

That's just the Young part of things. Again, there are fans who are celebrating benching Young while others think that you are pretty much beholden to try to develop him and see if he is salvageable. This team isn't talented enough to go anywhere, so maybe playing Young and riding with whatever happens (even if that means getting the No. 1 pick again). That's why this is a bit weird.

Tepper wanted Young. He said so in a press conference. He hired Frank Reich, the former Indianapolis Colts head coach and Panthers quarterback, to be the head coach to mentor Young. He was fired just 11 games into his first season and replaced with Chris Tabor. Tepper hired Dave Canales as the new head coach for 2024, and you would think his top job duty would be to work with Young and unlock his potential. 

Apparently that was just a two week project. The Bryce Young era ... despite all of the capital used to acquire the pick to draft him ... lasted just 18 games. That's Tapper in a nutshell during his time in Charlotte.

The Panthers have had six head coaches since Tepper bought the team in 2018. They had four under previous owner Jerry Richardson from 1995 to 2017 (22 years). That's usually a huge red flag of a bad owner -- one that's impatient and meddlesome. Tepper was the guy who wanted Young and, it seems, everyone had to play along. It has long been rumored that Reich didn't want Young ... but Tepper gets what he wants. During his short reign as Carolina's head coach, Reich admitted that Tepper would meet with him and go over on field ideas. 

Just yesterday after the Panthers' 26-3 home loss to the Los Angeles Chargers, Canales said that Young is still his starting quarterback. Well, that ended today when Canales magically changed his mind on the matter. When asked by the media if Tepper had any input on the decision, Canales answered by saying he wanted to keep that "private". 

That said a lot. 

So either Tepper meddles in personnel decisions, or he hires people who aren't good at their job. He hired Canales and general manager Dan Morgan this offseason ... and neither of them were responsible for drafting Young. But both were tasked with making him successful, and they seemed to think that it wasn't going to happen after just two weeks. The team traded away its top receiver and valuable draft picks to acquire Young and are ready to throw him away. 

Think about this: they traded two 1st round picks, two 2nd round picks and DJ Moore for Bryce Young. That means they traded their best receiver (Moore) and all that to get Young, who they are now throwing away. They also traded Christian McCaffrey to the San Francisco 49ers for a second, third, fourth and fifth round pick in 2022. This offseason, they also traded linebacker Brian Burns for a second and fifth round pick. So they traded arguably their three best players and four draft picks (including two first round picks) and got one first round pick out of all of that... and that was the one they used to draft Young.

Now, I want to stress that this isn't about how Young is a victim of being drafted into a poor organization. Well, he sort of is, but he has played poorly and under most circumstances the Panthers would be right to bench him for Andy Dalton. Dalton was once a decent starter for nine years with the Cincinnati Bengals but has spent the last five years as a backup or mentor for a young QB in Dallas, New Orleans, Chicago and Carolina. He's been astute at picking his jobs, as he's ended up starting 30 games over the last four seasons, and will add to that total starting in Week 3. 

Young has been really, really bad and hasn't shown anything close to improvement. If the Panthers hadn't given up so much for him, benching him would make sense. Maybe it does anyway if he has lost the locker room or he's in such a bad place that sitting for a bit and learning from the sidelines is truly the best idea to crack open his potential. Young may never be a starter in the NFL again. Or he could be like Darnold and Mayfield and just needs to get away from Charlotte and into a functional organization that can foster their talent. 

There's no doubt that the Panthers will be a better offense with Dalton running it. He's experienced and understands the assignment. Still, how much better will the Panthers be? The roster isn't talented enough to compete for the NFC South title ... let alone a playoff spot. Dalton is in his 14th season and isn't the future of the franchise. Young may not be, either, but the organization felt he was at one point and may be best served to ride this thing out. Even if Young continues to struggle, they'd probably get one of the top picks in the draft where they could move on from Young and draft his replacement. 

Of course, that's not happening. As Tepper did with Reich ... and Matt Rhule ... and Ron Rivera ... he's ready to move on to the next thing. Maybe that would even mean ditching Canales. Who knows? This is a guy who argues with critics, shows up to local businesses that troll him, and throw drinks at fans. There have been reports of a stressful and dysfunctional environment within the organization. There have been plenty of promises that haven't been kept and projects that never got off the ground. To many NFL observers, Tepper's Panthers has taken over the title as worst owner and franchise now that Snyder sold the Commanders (but Snyder is by far a worse owner than Tepper could ever dream to be).

That means nothing to Panthers fans, who want nothing more than for Tepper to sell the team. This was a franchise that went 17-1 and played in a Super Bowl in February 2016 that has yet to have a winning record since he took over just two years later. They are 31-70 since Tepper took over -- worst record in the NFL during that span. While I am not a fan, I'm a Charlottean and many of my family and friends are Panther fans who are sick of Tepper and what he's done to this franchise. Maybe he'll realize he can get a great return on his investment and sell the franchise for twice what he paid for it and the fans can get what they want.

Bench Tepper. 




Sunday, September 15, 2024

What Is The Future Of The Mountain West?



With the Pac-12 announcing that they'll be taking Boise State, Colorado State, Fresno State and San Diego State away from the Mountain West, of course speculation is about who the Pac-12 is coming for next. After all, the league needs to add at least two more members in order to be compliant to the NCAA as a conference in 2026.

Another question looming is the status of the Mountain West Conference. To be frank, it is on edge. 

Let's recap who remains in the Mountain West: Air Force, Nevada, New Mexico, San Jose State, UNLV, Utah State, Wyoming and Hawaii (football member only).

COULD MORE SCHOOLS LEAVE

Yes. As I already mentioned, the Pac-12 needs to add two more schools and there is a chance they could come from the Mountain West. There is a thought that if the Pac-12 truly wanted more MW schools than they would've already been brought over in the initial news last week, but that may just be the first step in a series of steps for the Pac-12 to resurrect their conference.

UNLV remains, likely, the most attractive candidate for the Pac-12. They are a football program on the rise, they have basketball history, and bring in a city that is highly desirable to the old Pac-12 and whatever the new version looks like. One problem is that Nevada could be tied to UNLV and the Wolf Pack aren't that wanted. Still, that could be a play the Pac-12 is forced to make.

Outside of the Rebels, Air Force and Wyoming may be the only schools truly interesting to the Pac-12.

WAIT, HOW DID WE GET HERE ANYWAY?

Here is the key to the whole thing. When the Pac-12 imploded and became just a two-team league (Oregon State, Washington State), those schools tried desperately to hang on to the value of the Pac-12. That not only means the name and the history, but the financial advantages left behind from the departing members (such as units earned from NCAA tournament successes, for example). They got that, which gave them financial flexibility to make some moves.

Oregon State and Washington State went into an agreement with the West Coast Conference to become affiliate members in basketball and a scheduling agreement with the Mountain West in football. Basically the MW will play seven conference games with each of the schools playing either Oregon State or Washington State once. To many, this seemed like the the beginnings of some sort of relationship between the two leagues, but what would that be?

Would the Pac-12 try to take MW schools? Would the MW take the Pac-12 schools? Would there be some sort of merger between the two leagues in order to consolidate their advantages? 

Earlier this month, the MW announced that they weren't willing to extend that football scheduling partnership for 2025. Soon after, the Pac-12 struck with the news of taking four MW schools. With the money the Pac-12 has built up, they are willing to help pay those school's exit fees as well as pay the MW for "poaching" the schools away (which was also part of the agreement between the two leagues). That poaching clause made the MW feel comfortable that the Pac-12 couldn't afford to take their schools nor would the school feel it was in the financial interests to leave the MW. What the Pac-12 was able to do with their war chest changed matters ... as well as the thinking that there is a broadcast deal out there for them that's worth more than what the MW has. 

This miscalculation by the MW could lead to their demise. For one, they had 33% of their members just leave for a conference that was hanging on by a thread. Second off, those members happen to be the most attractive schools to broadcasters and will not be replaced easily -- if at all. Not only does it look like the Pac-12 is able to grab a broadcast deal better than what the MW has now, it will also drastically lower the MW's deal when it comes up in a couple of years. 

WHAT DO THE CURRENT EIGHT MEMBERS DO?

This is tough. Of course all eight would love to receive their own invites from the Pac-12, but as we've pointed out that likely won't be the case. Maybe one or two schools can nab one, but the others will have to figure out what's next. The Mountain West will essentially be where the Pac-12 has been for the last year or so, except they lack the branding that the Pac-12 owns. 

Those schools could look to leave themselves. Of course, that wouldn't happen immediately since the same exit fees the four departing schools are having to deal with would apply to the other schools. If those schools left, they'd be leaving for Conference USA, the American Athletic Conference or Sun Belt (the MAC will likely be out of the equation).

Obviously the American would be the most attractive option, that league wouldn't want all the MW's inventory. Air Force would be interesting since Army and Navy already play football in the AAC. Right now, North Texas, UTSA and Tulsa are the most western of the current AAC schools so they could possibly be interested in Wyoming or UNLV if either of them were available. Of course, the AAC could see a few of its teams get poached by the Pac-12 (Memphis and Tulane seem to be mentioned the most) and could feel that stacking several MW teams is their best way of building back up.

The Sun Belt would be a stretch since it really doesn't fit with their strategy. Still, it could be an option.

Conference USA may be the best ... albeit sad ... bet. CUSA already has New Mexico State and UTEP, so adding any or all of the MW is very doable. That may not be the most desirable option, but if these schools feel desperate then it could be the straw that breaks the MW's back. Right now, the CUSA is seen as the lowest rung of the FBS conferences, so any MW school leaving for it would basically mean the MW is dead.

COULD THE MOUNTAIN WEST REBUILD?

Certainly. How, is the tricky question. The Mountain West can feel that they have a good enough brand that they can take CUSA schools away. As I mentioned earlier, UTEP and New Mexico State would be good options. So could Texas State, Sam Houston and Louisiana Tech. I'd doubt that any Sun Belt or AAC teams would want to leave the top two Group of 5 leagues for a western league that's gasping for air, so poaching Conference USA would be the more likely option.

The biggest move that the Mountain West could make is looking at several FCS schools to make the jump to FBS. Could it convince Idaho to give FBS a shot again? Maybe Montana and Montana State (they'd be a package deal)? Could North Dakota State and South Dakota State be willing to make the move from dominant FCS programs to the FBS? James Madison and Appalachian State have done so in recent years. If those two come, would North Dakota and South Dakota have to come with them? 

WHAT WOULD BE THE KINDA BEST CASE SCENARIO FOR THE MOUNTAIN WEST?

So let's go ahead and say that the Pac-12 takes UNLV away from the MW ... and that's it. So we are left with Air Force, Nevada, New Mexico, San Jose State, Utah State, Wyoming and Hawaii. The best case scenario would be to get North Dakota State and South Dakota State to jump from FCS. Maybe add UTEP and New Mexico State from Conference USA. That puts the Mountain West as an 11-team football conference that stays in the geographic footprint but adds the Dakotas. It still allows for growth (maybe Idaho or Sacramento State) if the Pac-12 took someone in addition to UNLV. 

WHAT IS THE WORST CASE SCENARIO? 

Basically the conference dies. We've seen buzzards fly around the Big 12 and Pac-12 over the last several years, but both conferences found ways to persevere. Could the Mountain West do the same? Maybe, but both the Big 12 and Pac-12 have assets that the MW just doesn't have which makes it less likely to be able to pull off that kind of resurrection. If the MW is deemed to forgone to save (similar to what happened to the Pac-12 last year), it really may not survive. The geography of the Mountain West makes it difficult to pull in members, which is why the MW and Pac-12 relationship so interesting. They both were looking at possibly ending the other one since they have some shared space. 

When the MW's broadcast deals are up, the numbers for a new deal might look ugly ... or at least less attractive than what Conference USA or someone else may be able to offer. Each school has different needs (hello, Hawaii) so there is no blanket answer for the remaining eight schools. 

Friday, September 13, 2024

ACC ... Go Ahead And Expand Again


Look, I wish things could go back to the way they used to be. My ACC was a nice, fit nine-team alliance when Florida State was added in the early 1990s. The league felt together and everyone played each other twice. I loved those days.

But that's all over and I've accepted that for quite some time. The ACC pulled Miami, Boston College and Virginia Tech from the Big East in the early 2000s; yanked Syracuse, Pitt, Notre Dame and Louisville in the mid-2010s; and became a landing spot for California, Stanford and SMU this year (oh, and they lost Maryland along the way). This will never be that ACC we grew up with ever again. The quicker we understand that it isn't coming back, the quicker we can accept reality and move on.

None of this makes sense anymore, so let's think outside the box. I did so three years ago when I begged the ACC to make a strong move and go after the Pac-12's schools. At the time, I felt the ACC should go grab Oregon, Cal, Stanford, USC and UCLA from the Pac-12 and make a 20 team conference. All of those schools are outstanding academically, which fits what the ACC is about, and it powers up the league with some really solid programs and gets the ACC onto the west coast (namely, LA). It also might .... might ... compel Notre Dame to become a full-time member. I mean, they were already playing five ACC games a season, and adding Stanford and USC (two schools they play each year) to the conference means that the Irish would be playing seven ACC opponents every year. Why not just let them play seven league games to the rest of the members' eight and enjoy all that comes with have Notre Dame as a football member?

At the time, people laughed that the ACC should have no business having members on the Pacific Ocean. "That's silly!" And why would they feel compelled to leave a conference they've been a part of for over 100 years??? Ridiculous!

Fast forward to now and Oregon, USC, UCLA (and Washington) all left the Pac-12 for the Big Ten. Oh, and the ACC now has Stanford and Cal as members. See? I was right, yet the ACC sat back and let everyone cut in front of them first. This could be a fatal move for the league.

My 2024 proposal is kind of the same. We know now that geography doesn't matter. We know the ACC is being held together by its Grant of Rights. We know that tradition "ACC schools" aren't really a thing anymore. So let's swing for the fences. Let's add two more schools.

UConn and Gonzaga.

Both schools have already been looking around, and both notably looked to get into the Big 12. Whatever the reason that hasn't happened yet isn't as important as the fact that both UConn and Gonzaga are willing to jump to a new opportunity. 

Let's start with UConn. Since the Big East reconfigured in the mid-2010s (due, in large part, to the ACC raiding the league), UConn has struggled to find a home. The basketball program helped form the AAC before finally getting back to the Big East a few years ago. The football program has been kicked around as an independent. So why not send them an invite to join the ACC? UConn joining North Carolina, Louisville and Duke in a basketball league? Um, yes, please! So what if they suck in football -- so does Cal and Stanford and we let them in! While it seems like sacrilege for UConn to want to leave the Big East, remember a couple points:

1. They have literally been talking to the Big 12 about possibly joining.

2. The Big East that they are in now is not the Big East they were a part of during the 1980s, 1990s and 2000s. UConn was never rivals with Xavier, Butler or Creighton.  I mean, being rivals with Syracuse, Pitt and Boston College again must sound alright. 

3. The football program has nowhere to really go

Point is that if the ACC offered an invite to UConn, they'd strongly consider it. They'd have rivals near them in both football and basketball and would be able to get on the field with some big names. If UConn was considering the Big 12 (their nearest opponents would be West Virginia and Cincinnati) then why not consider the ACC?

Which brings me to Gonzaga. I know it sounds absolutely ridiculous ... but so did what I said three years ago and now that's way more plausible. Gonzaga doesn't have football -- so what? Notre Dame isn't a football member either and we're making it work. Imagine having North Carolina, Duke, Louisville, UConn and Gonzaga in the same hoops league? It is even more intriguing since the ACC now has a western wing to the conference which makes Gonzaga not living on an island out there. With Cal and Stanford now members, Gonzaga has some partners to play alongside. Playing ACC competition heading into the NCAA tournament will definitely have them more ready to perform in March and April.  Plus since the Zags have no football program, their share of the pie (similar to Notre Dame) isn't as big. 

Look, this may be a bit more far-fetched than even my pitch three years ago but the ACC is in survival mode right now. While the ACC doesn't have to do anything at all, making proactive moves seems to be wise right now. That's why they added Cal and Stanford to begin with. With Clemson and Florida State trying their hardest to break free from the conference, there is a lot that's up in the air. 

Thursday, September 12, 2024

Pac-12 To Add Four Mountain West Schools And Is Back In Business


Late Wednesday night reports swirled that the Pac-12 conference ... which consists of just Oregon State and Washington State ... will be adding Mountain West members Boise State, Colorado State, Fresno State and San Diego State. Some bullet points on this:

SO WHAT HAPPENED?

This puts the conference at six members. For now, the NCAA allows the Pac-12 to be under the mandatory eight member threshold for two years (which would be the 2024-2025 and 2025-2026 seasons), which means the league must find two more schools to join them before that time frame ends. The four new schools will join the Pac-12 in 2026.

There are financial dealings which I won't go too in depth on, but it is important to note that the Pac-12 will help pay the four schools exit fees from the Mountain West as well as paying the MW a "poacher's fee", which was agreed to when the two leagues decided to do sports business this school year. The Pac-12 is able to do this because they've amassed a war chest due to keeping money and benefits the ten schools that bolted left behind. 

Since the Pac-12 watched those ten schools leave, there has been a lot of speculation over what will happen next. Would the Pac-12 rebuild be adding some Mountain West teams? Would the two Pac-12 teams join the Mountain West or another conference? Would the Pac-12 and Mountain West merge? There were other options, but those three were the most likely outcomes ... and the first one seems to have played out. 

The Pac-12 adds Boise State, who fits nicely with both Washington State (which is a six hour drive away) and Oregon State (about an eight hour drive). Boise State blasted on the scene about 15 years ago and has been one of the more popular candidates to make the jump to a Power 5 conference. Adding San Diego State and Fresno State gets the league back into California after losing all four of their schools from that state over the summer. Both have had solid football programs over the years. Colorado State may not have that kind of success, but they do bring the Denver area somewhat back to the Pac-12 after losing Colorado. 

WHO COULD JOIN THE PAC-12 NEXT? 

That's a good question. Typically conferences say that they're done with expansion for the moment once they do add schools ... even if that ends up not being true. But we all know that the Pac-12 cannot be done expanding since they must get to that eight member requirement by 2026, so this should move pretty quickly. 

Let me just start out by saying there is next to no way that Cal and Stanford return to the Pac-12. That seems to be the popular sentiment, but it really doesn't make much sense when you look at the reason most realignment happens -- money. When Cal and Stanford joined the ACC, they signed the same Grant of Rights deal that Florida State and Clemson are trying so hard to find a way out of. So there's no way the ACC willingly allows Cal and Stanford to go back to the Pac-12 right in front of Florida State and Clemson (who are in lawsuits against the ACC). A move like that would be devastating for the ACC since it would kick open the door for any school that wants out to do so ... and Florida State and Clemson could be joined by North Carolina, Virginia, Miami and others. The entire reason that the ACC even added Cal and Stanford was to keep the conference from imploding, so it makes no sense for them to trigger that happening.

Also understand that Cal and Stanford willingly opted to leave Oregon State and Washington State behind because they didn't want to risk being left with nothing and they felt that an invite from the ACC was better than whatever a new Pac-12 would look like. I mean, Cal and Stanford could've just joined the Mountain West instead of the ACC if the new Pac-12 was attractive to them. Right now they are in a Power 4 conference ... something that this new Pac-12 isn't guaranteed to be part of. The Pac-12 won't be able to cobble together any broadcast deal better than what they have with the ACC ... even if they agreed to a discounted rate. And Stanford playing conference games against Florida State, Clemson, Miami and Louisville is much more high profile than anything the Pac-12 offers. Cal and Stanford also enjoy the academic profile of the ACC. 

Sure, geography of the whole thing makes sense, but not much else does at the moment.

So who does make sense? There are more Mountain West schools to choose from, but the problem that league has is there is some real dead weight at the bottom. Wyoming makes sense from a geography standpoint and they've been a solid program, but do they attract eyes? I can see UNLV getting in because it brings in Las Vegas, but the football program has been bad for quite some time. Aside from that there is slim pickings. Air Force? Maybe. Nevada has been really, really bad. San Jose State has turned itself around, but are they that attractive? Same goes for Utah State and New Mexico. You also have to consider that if the Pac-12 was looking at adding any of these other Mountain West schools ... wouldn't they have done so with the four they've already offered? 

Maybe the Pac-12 looks more towards the midwest. Memphis could be really attractive. Like Boise State, it seems to have been on the short list of Group of 5 schools ready to move up. Tulane could also be a nice addition if they decide to go that route. That would also open up the possibility of UTSA, UTEP or North Texas. Louisiana Tech? 

See, that's the problem. There really aren't many great options out there. None of the Power 4 schools would leave to go to the Pac-12 and the Group of 5 possibilities aren't very sparkling. Still, they must add at least two schools. I think UNLV and Wyoming are the more likely candidates, unless they go after Memphis and UTSA. Heck, maybe they go after all four schools. 

A dark horse possibility is if the Pac-12 could convince North Dakota State and South Dakota State to make the step up from FCS to FBS.  

WHAT'S NEXT FOR THE MOUNTAIN WEST?

Obviously the Mountain West is pissed about this. Once the Pac-12 was gutted, pretty much everyone felt that they would dance around with the Mountain West and that's what has happened. Being mad doesn't help anything (ask the Big East in the mid-2000s) so they need to get to work.

First thing's first: is anyone else leaving? We already discussed that the Pac-12 could go after UNLV, Wyoming or others so it is difficult for the MW to make a plan when they aren't sure what's going to be left of their conference. Even so, they've got to be looking at Conference USA and the American conferences for new members. Of course, those candidates will also be hoping the Pac-12 asks them out to the prom first, so this could take some time. 

We do know that right now the MW is: Air Force, Nevada, New Mexico, San Jose State, UNLV, Utah State and Wyoming in all sports and Hawaii in football-only. That eight member requirement that I mentioned earlier for the Pac-12? Well that applies to the MW who now only has eight football members and seven for other sports. Starting today, the MW needs to be looking at who to bring in. 

The same teams I mentioned above would be MW candidates. The MW could really dig into Texas by adding UTEP, UTSA, Rice and North Texas. Maybe Louisiana Tech or UAB? 

There is something else to consider: What if other leagues begin to poach the Mountain West?  That is a legitimate question, especially when you consider that the MW hasn't had a team in the New Year's Six game since 2014. Could The American or Sun Belt really be able to begin pulling teams out of the Mountain West? I mean, if the Pac-12 goes after Memphis and Tulane, for example, why wouldn't the AAC be proactive and look at schools like New Mexico or Air Force (the AAC already has Army and Navy in the league as football members). Maybe that also leads to Wyoming or UNLV as travel partners with those schools. As we saw with the Pac-12 just one year ago, if members begin questioning where they are at and looking to jump ship, this could get out of hand really quickly. 

Tuesday, September 10, 2024

Sportz NFL Week 1 Recap


Just a quick recap of what I saw in my Sportz Room -- filled with TVs that I can watch all games going on at the same time.


GAME OF THE WEEK: Chiefs over Ravens. Can we get that for the AFC Championship? There was buzz with the defending champs against the reigning MVP; this being the first game of the season; and the game was well played. And it all came down to a toe landing out of bounds in the endzone.

UPSET OF THE WEEK: Patriots over Bengals. This is a stunner, but signs were there. The Patriots were looked at as one of the worst teams in the NFL entering the season, while the Bengals ... with a healthy Joe Burrow ... were a possible challenger to the two-time defending champion Chiefs. Yet New England, with new head coach Jerod Mayo, went into Cincinnati and beat the Bengals. Cincinnati didn't have Tee Higgins and Ja'Marr Chase played despite sitting all preseason. The concern comes from Burrow, who is coming back from wrist surgery and looked pretty uncomfortable on the sideline. 

DOMINANT PERFORMANCE OF THE WEEK: Saints over Panthers. Look, Carolina isn't very good. We knew this. But, man, are they really this bad? Derek Carr looked like Drew Brees out there just picking the Panthers defense apart. Everybody ate with the Saints 47-10 win. The question now turns to if Bryce Young really is that guy for the Panthers. I feel it is a bit early for those types of conversations, but this organization is trending towards having the worst record in the NFL for the second straight season and this time they'll get to keep that No. 1 overall pick. 

DUD OF THE WEEK: 49ers over Jets. Honestly, this isn't my thinking. I'm high on the Niners and down on the Jets. I didn't expect Aaron Rodgers to walk into Santa Clara after playing just four snaps since January 2023 and light up one of the better defenses in the NFL. But a lot of people have big plans for New York and that didn't look promising. Not only was the Jets offense a bit off, their vaunted defense was pushed around by one of the most physical teams in the league. 

STORYLINE OF THE WEEK: Quarterback play was iffy. Preseason is down to just three games now and we rarely see starters play anymore -- especially quarterbacks. It seemed to show all over the league this weekend. Joe Burrow, Aaron Rodgers and Kirk Cousins looked rusty after coming back from injuries. Rookies Caleb Williams, Jayden Daniels and Bo Nix struggled in their first games. But Deshaun Watson was horrible. Daniel Jones looked like his time in New York is over. Bryce Young's honeymoon is fading fast. Trevor Lawrence didn't look like he was worth the contract he signed this offseason. Jordan Love didn't look like the guy who dominated the second half of last season (then he got hurt). There certainly were some great performances by guys like Baker Mayfield, Derek Carr and CJ Stroud to name a few, but this was a soft start for some of the QBs.

Wednesday, September 4, 2024

ESPN/DirecTV Dispute Shows Us One Major Point

I don't want to use this space to get into the Disney dispute with DirecTV that caused its networks to be blacked out on it service. We are in Day 4 of this showdown with no end in sight, causing 11.3 million viewers to be without Disney channels ... most notably ESPN.

For full disclosure, I am one of those viewers.

I'm not going to get into my frustration with this here -- I have vented elsewhere to people representing both sides. I will however point out one thing that is very evident in this battle. It's about the games, stupid.

The games.

When programming was pulled on Sunday night right before the LSU-USC college football game (and during the US Open), people were pissed. They've been pissed that they missed Boston College upsetting Florida State on Monday night. And they will be extremely pissed starting Friday when they will begin missing college football games. Then imagine what it will be like when we get to Monday night and the Jets-49ers Monday Night Football game is blacked out for DirecTV subscribers. 

Which that's getting to my point ... and this is mainly pointed at ESPN.

No one is whining they are missing Stephen A. Smith shouting on First Take. No one is complaining that they can't get their daily update on the Dallas Cowboys, New York Jets or the Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback situation on GetUp!. No one is upset they can't watch two curmudgeons groan on Pardon The Interruption or a bunch of "columnists" banter topics on Around The Horn. We want our games. We want the games you guys spend the hours of 1am to 7pm Eastern Time screaming about.

ESPN taught us that we don't really need SportsCenter anymore. They admitted that we can go to YouTube or somewhere else to find the big sports clips of the day and get our sports news in real time via Twitter or whatever just as they do. Aside from their overnight content, SportsCenter has been reduced to a rerun of all the stuff people are talking about on all their other shows. What was once sports fans most important times of the day has been reduced to goofy jokes with some sports background. Even NFL Primetime, a show that was my lifeblood on Sundays growing up, has been relegated to ESPN+ content. And I do watch it every single Sunday during the NFL season.  

It is the games, stupid. 

I'm sure that ESPN knows that since they've done everything they can to make sure they've gobbled up as much live sports content they can. NFL? They have Monday Night Football. NBA? They are the top tier and home of the NBA Finals. MLB? They've got plenty. College sports? They have the SEC, ACC and the College Football Playoff as well as the top place for big time college hoops matchups. They also have plenty of other sports and events, just like the US Open I'm now missing. 

They know this, which is what sucks. This stalemate was going to last at least until this weekend. The game of chicken would play out while DirecTV customers are missing 19 college football games this weekend and, possibly, the Jets-49ers game on Monday night. 

ESPN also knows that I don't have to watch Sunday NFL Countdown this Sunday morning before Week 1 of the NFL season. I can switch over to NFL Network's NFL Gameday Morning instead. I've already said I don't need them for highlight shows since they've moved away from caring about that. They know they've spent a lot of money on these broadcast rights and have spent the last several years retooling their books by letting go some big name talent while paying a ton for Mike Greenberg, Stephen A. Smith, Joe Buck, Pat McAfee and Troy Aikman.

They are aware that this is a game of chicken that could be costly for both sides, but are banking that people will drop DirecTV for another service (pssst. they do this to all those services, too) before they switch to another network for their sports. They just hope we don't get used to going other places for content, especially when FOX, Amazon and NBC have made huge moves taking some of these events back. Plus, ESPN has fumbled some opportunities (their NBA studio show is horrific and they've been destroyed for breaking up their top NBA broadcast team and then watch two replacements leave for coaching jobs) and made some unpopular decisions regarding their talent (hello, RG3!). 

One thing ESPN does really well is the games. I can go all day not watching ESPN, but the games will always matter. Even if ESPN forgets that at times, the reality is that they entire thing is built on the actual competitions. Both ESPN and DirecTV are about to find out how important that is for their customers. Of course DirecTV's customers are its subscribers while ESPN's is its broadcast partners (like DirecTV) and its advertisers. If the advertisers who just paid boat loads of money to have their commercials and ads connected to ESPN events that are blacked out to 11.3 million people, the pressure will be on. 

Friday, August 30, 2024

Sportz' NFL Predictions

Here we go once again:

AFC EAST
1. Bills*
2. Dolphins*

3. Jets
4. Patriots

AFC SOUTH
1. Texans*

2. Jaguars
3. Colts
4. Titans

AFC NORTH
1. Bengals*
2. Ravens*
3. Browns*

4. Steelers

AFC WEST
1. Chiefs*

2. Chargers
3. Broncos
4. Raiders

NFC EAST
1. Eagles*
2. Cowboys*

3. Commanders
4. Giants

NFC SOUTH
1. Falcons*

2. Buccaneers
3. Saints
4. Panthers

NFC NORTH
1. Lions*
2. Packers*

3. Bears
4. Vikings

NFC WEST
1. 49ers*
2. Rams*

3. Cardinals
4. Rams

SUPER BOWL: Eagles over Ravens

Sorry, it's too boring to pick the Chiefs. 

Thursday, August 29, 2024

Ja'Marr Chase vs Bengals



Ja'Marr Chase and the Bengals contract situation. Here's my take.
*Chase is "holding-in" because he wants his contract extension. He is entering into Year 4 of his 4-year rookie deal (his base salary will be $1.055M). The Bengals have the right to offer him a 5th-year option ($22M) for 2025, which they have. His extension would be for 2026 and beyond.
*The Bengals do have Chase under contract for two more seasons (2004 and 2025). They don't have to do anything. I'll get into rookie deals in a second but Chase has no flexibility within that deal to do anything. If the Bengals franchise him in 2026, then he has a small bit of flexibility, but not much.
*Understand Chase's current contract. Every draft pick operates under a rookie scale. Meaning no matter who was selected with the 5th pick in the 2021 draft, they were going to get the same contract Chase did. There is no real negotiating. The contract is locked. So Chase had zero ability to maximize his value on the contract he's currently on. Either he signs it or he doesn't have a job playing football.
*Five key things to remember from Chase's point of view.
1. He's outperformed his current contract so getting his extension done now would be his security for the future locked in as well as signing bonus money in his pocket now.
2. As the graphic shows you, the other big time receivers in the 2021 draft class have already got their bags. So to the people whining "he's got two years left", he's seeing that his contemporaries who he was outplayed get their money. He wants his.
3. The "he has two years left" crowd forgets that the Bengals did Joe Burrow's extension last year when Burrow had ... say it with me ... two years left on his rookie deal. Sure, Burrow is a QB but it is well known that both those guys are the true franchise players who are the foundation of the Bengals present and future. At least that's what Chase thought until now.
4. Tee Higgins and Jesse Bates were both franchised by the Bengals. So, in Chase's mind, he can see a path where the organization does nothing but make him play out his last two years, and then franchise him for $40M in 2026. While Bates is a bit of a different situation because he is a safety, Higgins plays the same position as Chase and both players weren't dealt with in good faith. That's because ...
5. Mike Brown owns the Bengals. As well as the Bengals have done the last 20 years, it's been more about drafting talent than retaining it or adding expensive players. Aside from QBs (Palmer, Dalton, Burrow), the organization hasn't been keen on dropping a lot of money on other guys.
*Chase isn't going to get any cheaper. Understand that a new Chase deal doesn't replace his current one. He will be paid $1.055M this season even if he gets his extension done. That's why it is called an EXTENSION. and the 5th year option of $22M for 2025 still would be a thing. So the contract they are battling over is for 2026 and beyond. Having said that, Chase's pice isn't getting cheaper. In fact, in just a week it got more expensive since the Cowboys signed CeeDee Lamb to a new deal. Waiting one year won't make Chase's price go down. He could skip all of camp and practices by sitting all the way up to next Sunday and then continue to work on the deal ... and it will keep getting more expensive.
*Both sides are afraid of ... injury. The Bengals don't want to pay for an extension now because, what if Chase blows out his knee or something and are now on the hook for all that money? Chase wants a deal because, what if he blows out his knee or something and his price plummets?
*To me, it is absolutely ridiculous the Bengals haven't got this done. All the other 2021 receivers got their extensions and Chase has been better than all of them. Not just better, but he is clearly a major part of what the foundation of this franchise. The Eagles (Smith) and Dolphins (Waddle) already have another great receiver signed. Cincinnati does not. You passed up drafting a OT (both candidates for that spot are now All-Pros) to draft Chase and you aren't taking care of him?

Tuesday, August 27, 2024

Sportz' College Football Predictions




ATLANTIC COAST CONFERENCE


CHAMP: Florida State. This won't be as good of a team as last season's undefeated squad, but they are good enough to repeat as conference champs. Replacing Jordan Travis at QB will be a challenge, but they think DJ Uiagalelei can come back to the ACC and fare better.

SLEEPER: Miami. They have the talent and transfer QB Cam Ward is the real deal. Will Mario Cristobal get out of the way?

WATCH OUT FOR: SMU. The newcomers have a lot of swagger entering the ACC. 

BIG TEN CONFERENCE

CHAMP: Ohio State. The Buckeyes have everything they need to win a national championship. They are arguably the most talented team in the country. Add in an urgency to, well, beat Michigan and make a title run and Ohio State has a laser focus on their goals.

SLEEPER: Penn State. Ohio State, Michigan and Oregon are the big dogs, but Penn State has been liberated by the new Big Ten. No longer muffled by being in a division with Ohio State and Michigan, the Nittany Lions have a greater shot at making a move toward a playoff spot. 

WATCH OUR FOR: Iowa. The Hawkeyes' offense has been a running joke over the last few years, but with a new offensive coordinator and Michigan transfer Cade McNamara things could be changing in Iowa. 

BIG 12 CONFERENCE

CHAMP: Utah. I just love Utah's physicality and their grit which will serve them well in the Big 12. If Cam Rising can put up another (healthy) fantastic season, I think this conference is set up for the Utes.

SLEEPER: Kansas. The Jayhawks have QB Jalon Daniels and a decent recruiting class coming in to try to ... win the Big 12? 

WATCH OUT FOR: UCF. Gus Malzahn has been successful at a high level and they nabbed Arkansas transfer KJ Jefferson to run their offense. If the defense can do anything, this could be a team that makes a run towards a conference title game. 

SOUTHEASTERN CONFERENCE

CHAMP: Georgia. Duh. 

SLEEPER: Ole Miss. This just feels like Lane Kiffin's time in Oxford. 

WATCH OUT FOR: Missouri. The Tigers quietly went 11-2 last season and beat a weakened Ohio State in the Cotton Bowl. Their two losses were to LSU and their Heisman Trophy winning QB, and at Georgia. Eliah Drinkwitz has a good thing going in Columbia. 

PAC-12 CONFERENCE

CHAMP: Washington State.
I just think they're the better team

AMERICAN ATHLETIC CONFERENCE

CHAMP: Memphis. The Tigers have the best quarterback, the best receivers and just enough defense to win the AAC. 

SLEEPER: Tulane. I really think the Green Wave did well replacing Willie Fritz with Jon Sumrall. Makhi Hughes rushed for over 1,300 yards a year ago and will be a workhorse again. 

WATCH OUT FOR: South Florida. I really like what Alex Golesh has done in Tampa. He's been recruiting extremely well after finally breaking out of the basement last season. The offense has continuity. 

CONFERENCE USA

CHAMP: Liberty. Frankly they are the best team in this conference and I don't think it's close. They have an elite offense and enough playmakers on defense to stuff the rest of the league. I think they win the CUSA going away. 

SLEEPER: Western Kentucky. Probably the second most talented team in the conference. 

WATCH OUT FOR: Jacksonville State. Rich Rodriguez will usually put together a zany offense that defenses struggle to deal with.

MID-AMERICAN CONFERENCE

CHAMP: Miami-OH. The defending champs bring back a large chunk of their offensive starters. 

SLEEPER: Toledo. If the Rockets can find a QB who can utilize those fantastic receivers, they could make a run at a MAC title. 

WATCH OUT FOR: Northern Illinois. Antario Brown. Antario Brown. Antario Brown.

MOUNTAIN WEST

CHAMP: Boise State. Ashton Jeanty could be the best player in the Group of 5. 

SLEEPER: UNLV. Barry Odom did wonders in Vegas last season. I expect it to get even better in 2024. 

WATCH OUT FOR: Colorado State. Jay Norvell has this program on the right track and should reach their first bowl since 2017. This defense has the potential to get much better. 

SUN BELT CONFERENCE

CHAMP: Appalachian State. The Mountaineers got hot late last season and made a run to the Sun Belt title game. I think that momentum continues into this season. 

SLEEPER: Texas State. G.J. Kinne is doing his thing at Texas State. 

WATCH OUT FOR: Arkansas State. Hey man, I like their skill guys (almost all of those starters return) and I'm taking a chance on a Butch Jones clutch moment. 

PLAYOFFS

BYES:
Georgia, Ohio State, Utah, Florida State

G5 CHAMP: Memphis

AT LARGE:  Alabama, Texas, Oregon, Notre Dame, Missouri, Penn State, Miami

NATIONAL CHAMPION: Georgia

Saturday, May 11, 2024

UNC In the Big 12??? My Comments To a Podcast


I'm not typically a podcast guy, but one I do follow regularly is Isaac Schade's "Locked On Tar Heels". As a North Carolina Tar Heels fan, I like to be informed on what's going on with the Heels and to have some of my thoughts either confirmed or downgraded. During this free agency period of offseason roster reconstruction, I find it a useful tool to see what may be going on behind the scenes in Chapel Hill. I may not technically be one of Schade's "everydayers", but I do catch two or three episodes a week.

The other day, an interesting departure from the normal Tar Heel talk was an episode where Schade was being interviewed by a "Locked On Big 12" podcast where the discussion was about the possibility of UNC joining the Big 12 in some fashion. I hadn't considered that to be a serious option so the episode grabbed my interest ... so much so that I feel compelled to write this about it. Anything is possible in this day and age of college athletics, but I'm not feeling this as a possiblity.

SHOULD UNC THINK ABOUT JOINING THE BIG 12?

In short, no. As Mr. Schade remarked (very diplomatically, I may add), joining the Big 12 is the worst likely scenario on UNC's plate. Keeping the ACC together in a successful model is at the front of the wish list. After than comes a likely invitation from either the Big Ten or SEC (I'll get to that in a moment). If UNC ends up in the Big 12 then something horribly wrong happened. I mean that as no disrespect to the Big 12 which, honestly, has been a better conference in basketball of late and is quite a formidable football league. 

My issue is that UNC fits with the Big Ten or SEC much, much, much better than the Big 12. While not technically a catastrophic option, it is an option that really would be a loss for the UNC program. 

WHY NOT THE BIG 12?

Let's just pretend for the moment that UNC would entertain this alongside a Big Ten or SEC invite. First off, the Big 12 isn't as financially attractive as the Big Ten or SEC ... who are leading the way of conference realignment. There's more money in being a member of the Big Ten or SEC. Second is the geographical and historical context of what North Carolina wants in a new league. Obviously UNC fits in the geographic footprint of the SEC, and would be part of a new geographic footprint of the Big Ten. 

The SEC is filled with programs that UNC is very familiar with. South Carolina, Tennessee, Kentucky and this little rivalry with Alabama blooming. While the Big Ten has grown to a cross country conference, UNC fits with the academic profile of the league as an AAU school. UNC has also had a historical bond with the Big Ten with the now-defunct ACC/Big Ten Challenge that went on for decades and their battles with their programs -- Indiana, Michigan State, Michigan, Ohio State and, obviously, Maryland. 

That doesn't really exist with the Big 12. There is the UNC-Kansas thing which would be very attractive, but not really anything else. While the SEC is more geographically compact and the the Big Ten has sort of a midwestern hub of schools, the Big 12 is kinda all over the place. Then again, so is the ACC right now. 

In short, North Carolina doesn't feel like a Big 12 school. 

Look, the Big 12 should be commended. This league was almost dead two years ago when Texas and Oklahoma were lured away to the SEC. They've done a fantastic job not only holding the league together but turning into a league that may end up surviving while the Pac-12 died and the ACC is the one on life support. They had the foresight to bring in the best of the Group of 5 programs to fill its roster and jump on the Pac-12 before the ACC did. Side note: I will forever be angry that the ACC did not go after USC, UCLA, Oregon, Cal, Stanford and Washington before the Big Ten did. I wrote about this two years ago and I feel could be the worst decision the ACC didn't make in its history. 

WHAT WOULD BE GOOD ABOUT GOING TO THE BIG 12?

Imagine that I'm really looking in to this. There is obviously that basketball attractiveness of the Big 12. If the ACC imploded and there was a block of ACC schools like Duke or Virginia willing to move with UNC to the Big 12, imagine what that hoops conference would look like.

UNC, Duke and Virginia have won national championships over the last decade. So has the Big 12's Kansas (ugh, we know) and Baylor. Texas Tech lost to Virginia in the 2019 NCAA tournament final. Newcomer Arizona is a tier or two below blue blood status. Houston has built itself up to be a power again. Iowa State is a really good program. BYU, Cincinnati, Kansas State, West Virginia and Utah have had their moments. That would be a basketball-centric league that would appease the Heels' more hoops-minded fans. 

As far as football, well that's hard to say. The Big 12's biggest football powers (Texas, Oklahoma) are leaving so there is a power vacuum that needs to be filled. With no obvious power school to block success like the ACC (Clemson, Florida State), SEC (Georgia, Alabama) or Big Ten (Michigan, Ohio State), there is a better chance for the Tar Heels to make some noise in the Big 12. There are some good programs left, but none are historical powers like the six I just named. North Carolina could compete just as well as they have in the ACC.

FORGET THE BIG 12. WHAT DOES UNC WANT WITH ITS FIRST OPTION OF STAYING IN THE ACC?

This one is hard. First off, UNC is a flagship program of the ACC and has found success in football and basketball ... among other sports. What UNC says in ACC affairs matters. Not only are they an O.G. of the conference with major successes, they also reside smack dab in the hub of the conference. While the influence of the Big Four North Carolina schools isn't as powerful as it was in the 20th century, it still is a North Carolina-centric league with the league offices in nearby Charlotte. Leaving to go anywhere else means UNC is a new guy at the club and doesn't have any of the earned power it has in the ACC.

But what would an ACC look like going forward?

That's really hard to say. My genuine hope is that the ACC can stay together for a long as they can and at least get to the part of the story where college football decides to separate and form its own entity. What that could mean for Carolina and the ACC is that football goes off to be this super league but leaves all the other stuff behind. So North Carolina would be part of this new super football league where they they would be part of some new division playing a new way ... but the ACC is still intact for basketball and other sports. That could put the ACC in a power position to begin forming a more basketball-centric league. You may begin to see a sort of reverse-realignment where geography may matter more to schools since the football money comes from this super league. 

For instance: UNC and most of the rest of the ACC now plays football in the new super league. UNC plays in the Atlantic Division of this league with a lot of the schools they are currently in the ACC. Money comes from the TV contracts that get shared throughout that super league and there's no need to have these bastardized leagues (like having Cal and Stanford in the ACC) we are seeing now. 

You could, theoretically, see the Pac-12 get back together since there's no need for USC, UCLA, Oregon or Washington to be in the Big Ten. They get their football money from this super league and may rather go back to the perks of the Pac-12's everything else. That means Cal and Stanford are back where they should be. 

On this side of the country, the ACC is a more stable league with Clemson and Florida State good with their membership since their football programs are now cashing in. We go back to where football doesn't drive these decisions because everyone is taken care of. It may be an idealistic approach to this, but it is one I am clinging on to.

OKAY, BUT THE ACC DOES IMPLODE AND LOOKS ELSEWHERE? WHAT IS THE NUMBER 2 OPTION?

The Big Ten. North Carolina fancies itself more as a Big Ten school than an SEC one. So do I. North Carolina is an AAU school just like every one of the Big Ten schools (Nebraska used to be, but isn't anymore). Not just that, but UNC has a very diverse program of 28 sports ... and so does the Big Ten. The SEC doesn't sanction as many sports, so UNC would have to find homes for them somewhere else. As any UNC fan knows, this is a school that prides itself of having fantastic programs like field hockey, soccer, wrestling, golf, etc and wants to find stable homes for all of them. 

The Big Ten makes sense.

The SEC makes sense as well, but not as much. There are the obvious regional fits and rivalries that we've touched on. UNC in the SEC would mean a much more compact conference that would actually condense UNC's conference footprint. Right now, the SEC shares land with the ACC in South Carolina, Georgia, Florida and Kentucky (well, and Texas with SMU's move to the ACC). A move to the Big Ten would mean UNC would be in a more mid-west centric league with four schools on the Pacific Coast. The SEC would be as west as Texas and as north as Kentucky. The SEC is the premiere league for football, so it would jolt the competition in that sport -- for better or worse. The SEC is also an emerging basketball conference with another blue blood sitting there in Kentucky.  

The Big Ten is a more desirable home due to academics and sports profile, but the SEC is a more than adequate landing spot. 

WHAT IS IT THAT WE DO KNOW RIGHT NOW?

Well, that North Carolina should not be a school that is scared right now. UNC has some power. As far as the ACC goes, North Carolina has irons is a few fires ... both in regards to keeping the ACC intact as well as leaving the league. If the ACC implodes, UNC has positioned itself to be a very desirable school that the Big Ten, SEC and the Big 12 would love to add. UNC doesn't need to worry like Boston College, Syracuse, Virginia Tech or even NC State, Duke or Wake Forest. UNC is a driver in all of this and should be able to have a set at one of the big tables ... even if it is a seismic change that fans aren't wanting. 

While Clemson and Florida State are now fighting the ACC for their freedom, UNC can sit back and let them get dirt on their hands while calmly strategizing their next moves. If Clemson and Florida State are successful in breaking away, North Carolina could be right out the door with them and land a Big Ten or SEC invite. If the ACC holds together this thing via legal and financial means, UNC can focus on being leaders in the league. 

North Carolina isn't desperate right now and seems to be holding a good hand.